Taylor v. State

844 So. 2d 777, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7075, 2003 WL 21076653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 760 So. 2d 298
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2003·No. No. 3D02-1550·Published

Opinion

[778]*778 On Motion for Rehearing Granted

PER CURIAM.

We grant defendant’s motion for rehearing, reverse in part the order denying his motion for postconviction relief, and remand this matter to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on points two and five of defendant’s motion. See McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948 (Fla.2002) (holding that where no evidentiary hearing on ineffective assistance of counsel is held below, appellate court must accept defendant’s factual allegations to the extent they are not refuted by the record). We affirm the trial court’s order as to the remaining issues raised.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded for an evidentiary hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 844 So. 2d 777, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7075, 2003 WL 21076653 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

844 So. 2d 777 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLin v. State
827 So. 2d 948 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)