Taylor v. State

586 So. 2d 1345, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13949, 1991 WL 203119
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1991·No. No. 90-02677·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, George Taylor, seeks reversal of a departure sentence imposed upon him after this court previously reversed an earlier sentence for failure to prepare a written scoresheet. See Taylor v. State, 563 So.2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). In the instant appeal Taylor claims that the trial court violated the principles of Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (FLa.1990), in imposing a departure sentence. We agree and reverse because the trial court was foreclosed from departing from the guidelines upon our remand in Taylor’s first appeal. Pope; see also Day v. State, 573 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Reversed and remanded with directions to impose a guidelines sentence.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 586 So. 2d 1345, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13949, 1991 WL 203119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 1345 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaither v. State
614 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)