Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State

551 So. 2d 1250, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2540, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6191, 1989 WL 132544
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2469 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1989·No. No. 88-3005·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that this sentence must be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing because the trial court failed to provide written reasons for departing from the recommended guidelines sentence. Thus, we vacate the sentence and remand with directions that the trial court resentence appellant within the guidelines. Reid v. State, 531 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur. NIMMONS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 551 So. 2d 1250, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2540, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6191, 1989 WL 132544 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

551 So. 2d 1250 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. State
542 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Reid v. State
531 So. 2d 211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Stewart v. State
549 So. 2d 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Roberts v. State
547 So. 2d 129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Shull v. Dugger
515 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)