Taylor v. State
113 So. 919, 22 Ala. App. 693
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Ala. App. 161 →
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of grand larceny. There is no exception of merit disclosed in the record. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 113 So. 919, 22 Ala. App. 693 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).
113 So. 919 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.