Taylor v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Taylor v. State

99 So. 733, 19 Ala. App. 600, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 63

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 12, 1924

Docket7 Div. 933. [fn*]

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 So. 733 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. State, 99 So. 733, 19 Ala. App. 600, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 63 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The indictment contained two counts, one charging larceny and the other receiving stolen goods. The verdict of the jury is predicated on the second count. Whatever was taken at the time of the larceny is of the res gestse and is relevant to the issue.

A witness, if he knew, can testify as to the identity of a suit of clothes without giving any parii-ular identifying description. The probative íorce of sucb testimony is for the jury.

We have examined the entire record. There are no prejudicial errors, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI