Taylor v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Taylor v. State

70 So. 949, 14 Ala. App. 13, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 4

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 3, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 70 So. 949 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. State, 70 So. 949, 14 Ala. App. 13, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 4 (Ala. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PELHAM, P. J.

The appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction finding the defendant guilty of seduction, following a verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant in due form, sentencing him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 6 years. The certificate of the clerk shows that more than 90 days have elapsed [14]*14since the judgment of conviction and notation of appeal by defendant, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented. There being no bill of exceptions, this court cannot review and pass upon the charges set out in the record as refused to the defendant.

We find nothing in the record authorizing a reversal of the judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PELHAM, P. J.

The appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction finding the defendant guilty of seduction, following a verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant in due form, sentencing him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 6 years. The certificate of the clerk shows that more than 90 days have elapsed [14]*14since the judgment of conviction and notation of appeal by defendant, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented. There being no bill of exceptions, this court cannot review and pass upon the charges set out in the record as refused to the defendant.

We find nothing in the record authorizing a reversal of the judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 So. 949, 14 Ala. App. 13, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-alactapp-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack