McQueen v. State

88 So. 190, 17 Ala. App. 628, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 243
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 1920·No. 6 Div. 703.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment for assault with intent to murder, and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than two nor more than five years. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing one has expired.

[1,2] The court will not review the motion for a new trial, as there is no showing as to what evidence, if any, was offered in connection with the motion. Ross v. State, 16 Ala. App. 393, 78 South. 309. Neither will the charges refused to the appellant be considered, there being no bill of exceptions, and the oral charge of thQ court not being set out. Climer v. St. Clair County Tel. Co., 200 Ala. 656, 77 South. 30; Dorough v. State, 14 Ala. App. 110, 72 South. 208; Mitchell v. State, 14 Ala. App. 104, 71 South. 982; Taylor v. State, 14 Ala. App. 13, 70 South. 949.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McQueen v. State, 88 So. 190, 17 Ala. App. 628, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 243 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

88 So. 190 (McQueen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shewbart v. State
32 So. 2d 241 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1947)
Wilson v. State
101 So. 633 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)