Taylor v. Saul

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:21CV21-GCM-DCK

DELORES TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed July 20, 2022. (Doc. No. 17). The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of the memorandum. It appears to the Court that the parties have not filed any such objections. After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum, the Court concludes that there is no clear error on the face of the record and that the recommendation to grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the Commissioner’s determination is correct and in accordance with law. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate are accepted, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED. The Commissioner’s determination is hereby affirmed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation of the magistrate is hereby AFFIRMED.

Lbal tbh Graham C. Mullen ee United States District Judge “te

Signed: August 8, 2022