Taylor v. Saul

W.D. North Carolina

Taylor v. Saul

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina

DecidedJune 30, 2021

Docket5:20-cv-00099

StatusUnknown

This text of Taylor v. Saul (Taylor v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Saul, (W.D.N.C. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-00099-FDW HOPE TAYLOR, Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Remand to the Social Security Administration. (Doc. No. 19). The Commissioner wishes to conduct further fact finding and other administrative proceedings. The Court finds goof cause has been alleged for remand and that further administrative fact-finding is warranted. Accordingly, the Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings, including a new hearing. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 US. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Additionally, Plaintiff's pending Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. No. 16) and Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 14) are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: June 30, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-00099-FDW HOPE TAYLOR, Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Remand to the Social Security Administration. (Doc. No. 19). The Commissioner wishes to conduct further fact finding and other administrative proceedings. The Court finds goof cause has been alleged for remand and that further administrative fact-finding is warranted. Accordingly, the Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings, including a new hearing. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 US. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Additionally, Plaintiff's pending Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. No. 16) and Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 14) are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: June 30, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Taylor v. Saul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-saul-ncwd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack