Taylor v. ROSE FURNITURE CO.

341 F. Supp. 2d 576, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22892, 2004 WL 2569500
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina
DecidedOctober 26, 2004
Docket1:04 CV 00450
StatusPublished

This text of 341 F. Supp. 2d 576 (Taylor v. ROSE FURNITURE CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. ROSE FURNITURE CO., 341 F. Supp. 2d 576, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22892, 2004 WL 2569500 (M.D.N.C. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

BULLOCK, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously herewith,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss Plaintiffs first cause of action against all Defendants entitled “Discrimination in Violation of Public Policy” is GRANTED; Defendants’ motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss Plaintiffs second cause of action under the FMLA against the individual Defendants is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion [Doc. # 11] for a default judgment against Defendant Rose Furniture Company on Plaintiffs claim under the FMLA is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. Wood
341 F. Supp. 2d 576 (M.D. North Carolina, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 F. Supp. 2d 576, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22892, 2004 WL 2569500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-rose-furniture-co-ncmd-2004.