Home/Oregon Supreme Court/Taylor v. RAMSAY-GERDING CONST. CO.

Taylor v. RAMSAY-GERDING CONST. CO.

202 P.3d 179, 346 Or. 10
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 2009
DocketS055608
StatusPublished

This text of 202 P.3d 179 (Taylor v. RAMSAY-GERDING CONST. CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. RAMSAY-GERDING CONST. CO., 202 P.3d 179, 346 Or. 10 (Or. 2009).

Opinion

202 P.3d 179 (2009)
346 Or. 10

TAYLOR
v.
RAMSAY-GERDING CONST. CO.

No. (S055608).

Supreme Court of Oregon.

February 11, 2009.

Petition for review allowed.

Upon consideration by the court. Petitioners' petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with the Court of Appeals' disposition on remand of Taylor v. Ramsay-Gerding Construction Co., 216 Or.App. 441, 173 P.3d 1225 (2007). Petitioners on review's petition for attorney fees is denied, without prejudice to seek an award in the Court of Appeals for their attorney fees on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Ramsay-Gerding Construction Co.
173 P.3d 1225 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 P.3d 179, 346 Or. 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-ramsay-gerding-const-co-or-2009.