Taylor v. Perrin
This text of 654 So. 2d 1019 (Taylor v. Perrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lewis TAYLOR, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Everett I. PERRIN, Jr., et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Lewis Taylor, Jr., appellant, pro se.
No appearance for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Taylor appeals an order summarily denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which stated that "the petition on its face has failed to state any cause upon which relief may be granted." In our review, we must assume the allegations of the habeas petition are true. See Guess v. Barton, 599 So.2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In this case the habeas petition alleges that administrative remedies have been exhausted and claims due process and double jeopardy violations in regard to Taylor's confinement to Close Management. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Roy v. Dugger, 592 So.2d 1235 *1020 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) and Guess v. Barton, supra.
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
654 So. 2d 1019, 1995 WL 276111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-perrin-fladistctapp-1995.