Katwaroo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Katwaroo v. State

947 So. 2d 550, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21632, 2006 WL 3780637

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 2006·No. No. 4D06-4152·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The trial court denied appellant’s motion for reduction, modification or [551] correction of sentence as legally insufficient. We agree, as it did not allege the type of error that can be corrected pursuant to rule 3.800. Instead, appellant challenges the conditions of his confinement, which is a claim properly addressed by administrative proceedings and then, after exhaustion of administrative remedies, see Taylor v. Perrin, 654 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), by petition for writ of habeas corpus which must be brought in the jurisdiction in which he is being held. See Harvard v. Singletary, 733 So.2d 1020 (Fla.1999).

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The trial court denied appellant’s motion for reduction, modification or [551] correction of sentence as legally insufficient. We agree, as it did not allege the type of error that can be corrected pursuant to rule 3.800. Instead, appellant challenges the conditions of his confinement, which is a claim properly addressed by administrative proceedings and then, after exhaustion of administrative remedies, see Taylor v. Perrin, 654 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), by petition for writ of habeas corpus which must be brought in the jurisdiction in which he is being held. See Harvard v. Singletary, 733 So.2d 1020 (Fla.1999).

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Katwaroo v. State, 947 So. 2d 550, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21632, 2006 WL 3780637 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

947 So. 2d 550 (Katwaroo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related