Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford

352 U.S. 805, 77 S. Ct. 33, 1 L. Ed. 2d 38, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 392

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 8, 1956·No. No. 88·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford, 352 U.S. 805, 77 S. Ct. 33, 1 L. Ed. 2d 38, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 392 (1956).

Pincite

352 U.S. 805 (Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. The State of South Carolina, Lexington County, the State Board of Pharmaceutical Examiners, Board of Medical Examiners, United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. The State of Wyoming, the Wyoming State Board of Pharmacy, the Wyoming State Board of Medical Examiners, and the Department of Health and Social Services, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Joseph A. Califano, in His Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of America

582 F.2d 849 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)

Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration

582 F.2d 849 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)

Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners

263 F.2d 661 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)

Hitchcock v. Collenberg

353 U.S. 919 (Supreme Court, 1957)