Hitchcock v. Collenberg
353 U.S. 919, 77 S. Ct. 679
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 1, 1957
DocketNo. 734
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 353 U.S. 919 (Hitchcock v. Collenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hitchcock v. Collenberg, 353 U.S. 919, 77 S. Ct. 679 (1957).
Opinion
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford, 352 U. S. 805; Dantzler v. Callison, 352 U. S. 939; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration
582 F.2d 849 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
State v. Maxfield
564 P.2d 968 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)
Beck v. McLeod
240 F. Supp. 708 (E.D. South Carolina, 1965)
England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
375 U.S. 411 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Martin v. Walton
368 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
263 F.2d 661 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
353 U.S. 919, 77 S. Ct. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hitchcock-v-collenberg-scotus-1957.