Hitchcock v. Collenberg
353 U.S. 919, 77 S. Ct. 679
Opinion
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford, 352 U. S. 805; Dantzler v. Callison, 352 U. S. 939; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hitchcock v. Collenberg, 353 U.S. 919, 77 S. Ct. 679 (1957).
353 U.S. 919 (Hitchcock v. Collenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration
582 F.2d 849 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
State v. Maxfield
564 P.2d 968 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)
Beck v. McLeod
240 F. Supp. 708 (E.D. South Carolina, 1965)
England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
375 U.S. 411 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Martin v. Walton
368 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
263 F.2d 661 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)