Taylor v. Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1566
ALPHONZO TAYLOR, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GENE JOHNSON; WILLIAM ROGERS; MARILYN HILL; TAMMY ESTEP; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cv-00887-JRS)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 5, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alphonzo Taylor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Gregory Clayton Fleming, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Alphonzo Taylor, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Taylor v. Johnson, No. 3:05-cv-00887-JRS (E.D.
Va. Apr. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Johnson (Taylor v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.