Taylor v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Taylor v. Johnson

198 F. App'x 309

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2006·No. No. 06-1566·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alphonzo Taylor, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Johnson, No. 3:05-cv-00887-JRS (E.D.Va. Apr. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Alphonzo Taylor, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Johnson, No. 3:05-cv-00887-JRS (E.D.Va. Apr. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Taylor v. Johnson, 198 F. App'x 309 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

198 F. App'x 309 (Taylor v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.