Taylor v. Greenway Restaurant, Inc.

173 A.2d 211, 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4563, 1961 D.C. App. LEXIS 310
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 17, 1961·No. 2771·Published·Cited by 31 cases

Opinion

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant Taylor was employed by appellee Greenway Restaurant as bartender and night manager at a salary of $100 a week. After working for several weeks he was discharged and paid in full for the time he worked. He then brought this action for $100 as “salary due in lieu of one week’s notice of discharge.” From an adverse judgment he appeals.

Appellant’s theory appears to be that because he was hired at a weekly wage, he could not be legally discharged without a week’s notice and that in the absence of such notice he was entitled to an additional week’s salary. Appellant’s employment was for no definite period and was subject to-termination at the will of either party. Pfeffer v. Ernst, D.C.Mun.App., 82 A.2d 763. Except when specifically so provided, by agreement or by statute, neither employer nor employee is entitled to notice of termination. Furthermore, the trial court found that Taylor’s employment was conditioned upon his services proving to be satisfactory and that they proved to be unsatisfactory. We see no basis for disturbing the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Greenway Restaurant, Inc., 173 A.2d 211, 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4563, 1961 D.C. App. LEXIS 310 (D.C. 1961).

173 A.2d 211 (Taylor v. Greenway Restaurant, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. District of Columbia
828 F. Supp. 2d 87 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.
372 F. Supp. 2d 61 (District of Columbia, 2005)
Riggs v. Home Builders Institute
203 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2002)
Dale v. Thomason
962 F. Supp. 181 (District of Columbia, 1997)
Carl v. Children's Hospital
657 A.2d 286 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
Nolting v. National Capital Group, Inc.
621 A.2d 1387 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Gray v. Citizens Bank of Washington
602 A.2d 1096 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Nickens v. Labor Agency of Metropolitan Washington
600 A.2d 813 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., Inc.
597 A.2d 28 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
International City Management Ass'n Retirement Corp. v. Watkins
726 F. Supp. 1 (District of Columbia, 1989)
INTERN. CITY MGT. ASS'N RET. CORP. v. Watkins
726 F. Supp. 1 (District of Columbia, 1989)
Sorrells v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros., Miller & Rhoads, Inc.
565 A.2d 285 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Buttell v. American Podiatric Medical Ass'n
700 F. Supp. 592 (District of Columbia, 1988)
Sydney O. Hall v. Claude A. Ford
856 F.2d 255 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Wemhoff v. Investors Management Corp. of America
528 A.2d 1205 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)
Smith v. Chamber of Commerce of United States
645 F. Supp. 604 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Newman v. Legal Services Corp.
628 F. Supp. 535 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Parker v. National Corp. for Housing Partnerships
619 F. Supp. 1061 (District of Columbia, 1985)
Ivy v. Army Times Publishing Co.
428 A.2d 831 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1981)
Sullivan v. Heritage Foundation
399 A.2d 856 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)