Taylor v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.
This text of 947 N.E.2d 680 (Taylor v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Franklin App. No. 09AP-949, 2010-Ohio-2731. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.
Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file an emergency motion for expedited pro [1497]*1497hac vice admission, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. The motion for pro hac vice admission of attorney Stanley J. Parzen, which is attached to the motion for leave, is deemed filed, and the motion for pro hac vice admission is granted.
Upon consideration of appellant’s emergency motion for continuation of oral argument, it is ordered that the motion is denied as moot, and oral argument shall proceed in this case on Wednesday, May 25, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
947 N.E.2d 680, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-ernst-young-llp-ohio-2011.