Taylor v. Department of Motor Vehicles

D.C. Circuit

Taylor v. Department of Motor Vehicles

180 F. App'x 172

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 2006

DocketNo. 05-7119

StatusPublished

This text of 180 F. App'x 172 (Taylor v. Department of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 180 F. App'x 172 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 29, 2005 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as the complaint failed to state a claim based on federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, nor was there diversity of citizenship, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI