Taylor v. Crosby (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Taylor v. Crosby (Slip Opinion)

2016 Ohio 5820

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 2016

Docket2014-1886

StatusPublished

This text of 2016 Ohio 5820 (Taylor v. Crosby (Slip Opinion)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Crosby (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5820 (Ohio 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Taylor v. Crosby, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5820.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-5820 TAYLOR ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CROSBY ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Taylor v. Crosby, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5820.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, and cause remanded to trial court for determination regarding compliance with 2006 version of Dormant Mineral Act. (No. 2014-1886—Submitted August 31, 2016—Decided September 15, 2016.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County, No. 13 BE 32, 2014-Ohio-4433. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5796, ___ N.E.3d ___, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio- 5793, ___ N.E.3d ___, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act. O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, and O’NEILL, JJ., dissent. _________________ Frizzi Law Offices and Daniel L. Frizzi Jr., for appellees Benjamin F. Taylor and Donald F. Taylor. Jividen Law Offices, P.L.L.C., David A. Jividen, and Chad C. Groome, for appellee Mary Lou Hutchins. Myser & Davies, Richard A. Myser, and Adam L. Myser, for appellants. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Taylor v. Crosby, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5820.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-5820 TAYLOR ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CROSBY ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Taylor v. Crosby, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5820.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, and cause remanded to trial court for determination regarding compliance with 2006 version of Dormant Mineral Act. (No. 2014-1886—Submitted August 31, 2016—Decided September 15, 2016.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County, No. 13 BE 32, 2014-Ohio-4433. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5796, ___ N.E.3d ___, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio- 5793, ___ N.E.3d ___, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act. O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, and O’NEILL, JJ., dissent. _________________ Frizzi Law Offices and Daniel L. Frizzi Jr., for appellees Benjamin F. Taylor and Donald F. Taylor. Jividen Law Offices, P.L.L.C., David A. Jividen, and Chad C. Groome, for appellee Mary Lou Hutchins. Myser & Davies, Richard A. Myser, and Adam L. Myser, for appellants. _________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 Ohio 5820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-crosby-slip-opinion-ohio-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack