Taylor v. Crosby

2016 Ohio 5820, 81 N.E.3d 1223, 150 Ohio St. 3d 344
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 2016·No. No. 2014-1886·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, 149 Ohio St.3d 282, 2016-Ohio-5793, 74 N.E.3d 427, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act.

O'Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Crosby, 2016 Ohio 5820, 81 N.E.3d 1223, 150 Ohio St. 3d 344 (Ohio 2016).

2016 Ohio 5820 (Taylor v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson v. Stalder
2024 Ohio 3037 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
Jeffco Resources, Inc. v. Abrecht
2023 Ohio 4712 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
West v. Bode
2019 Ohio 4092 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
Jefferis Real Estate Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC v. Schaffner Law Offices, L.P.
109 N.E.3d 1265 (Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Belmont County, 2018)
Whaley v. Schaffner Law Offices, L.P.A.
2017 Ohio 7698 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
Taylor v. Crosby (Slip Opinion)
2016 Ohio 5820 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)