Taylor v. City of Newport News

197 S.E.2d 209, 214 Va. 9, 1973 Va. LEXIS 243
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedJune 11, 1973
DocketRecord 8126
StatusPublished
Cited by54 cases

This text of 197 S.E.2d 209 (Taylor v. City of Newport News) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. City of Newport News, 197 S.E.2d 209, 214 Va. 9, 1973 Va. LEXIS 243 (Va. 1973).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole question to be decided in this case is whether a city may be held liable in damages for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian in a fall caused by a slippery substance negligently spilled on a public sidewalk by a city employee while collecting garbage. The trial court, in granting the motion of the defendant city of Newport News to strike the evidence, ruled that governmental immunity pro *10 tected the city from liability in such a case. The unsuccessful plaintiff has appealed the adverse judgment.

The plaintiff, Marjorie Taylor, was injured when she alighted from a bus in the city of Newport News at approximately 10 p.m. on November 21, 1967. As she stepped off the bus onto the public sidewalk, her foot struck a substance made slippery by rain, and she slipped and fell. The substance was grease used in cooking which had been spilled at about 8 a.m. the same day. The grease was spilled by an employee of the city when he was placing a lard can in a truck in the course of his duties as a garbage collector.

We are of opinion that the trial court properly ruled that the city was immune from liability for Mrs. Taylor’s injury. In Virginia, a municipality acts in a dual capacity, the one governmental and the other proprietary. It is immune from liability for negligence in performing or in failing to perform governmental functions. It is not so immune with respect to proprietary functions. Fenon v. City of Norfolk, 203 Va. 551, 555, 125 S.E.2d 808, 811 (1962).

The municipal collection of garbage is a governmental function. Ashbury v. Norfolk, 152 Va. 278, 283, 147 S.E. 223, 224-25 (1929). On the other hand, municipal maintenance of public streets and sidewalks is a proprietary function. City of Norfolk v. Hall, 175 Va. 545, 551-52, 9 S.E.2d 356, 359 (1940). But when injury occurs in a street or on a sidewalk not from some defect therein but from the alleged negligence of a municipal employee engaged in a governmental function such as the collection of garbage, the municipality is immune from liability. Ashbury v. Norfolk, supra. In other words, where governmental and proprietary functions coincide, the governmental function is the overriding factor.

In this case, Mrs. Taylor concedes that the city was performing a governmental function, the collection of garbage, when the grease which caused her fall was spilled. Consequently, she admits that she has no cause of action against the city for any negligence involved in the spillage. She contends, however, that because the grease was permitted to remain on the sidewalk for fourteen hours, the role of the city shifted from governmental to the proprietary function of maintaining the streets and sidewalks in a safe condition. In failing to perform the proprietary function of removing the grease before her fall, Mrs. Taylor concludes, the city committed a separate act of negligence for which it is not immune from liability.

*11 Mrs. Taylor’s contention has appeal, but we cannot accept it. Her sole assertion is that by the mere passage of time the city’s function was transformed from governmental to proprietary. But the spilled grease on the sidewalk, just as a dropped banana peel, did not become any less an item of garbage because it was permitted to remain fourteen hours. So the passage of time had no legal effect on the situation. The city’s failure to remove the grease constituted nothing more than the omission of performance of the governmental function of collecting garbage, for which the city is immune from liability.

The judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellis v. Jolley
Supreme Court of Virginia, 2025
Curtis David Lytle v. City of Suffolk
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2025
Angel L. Jones v. City of Portsmouth
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2025
Michael Canter v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2024
JT's Hauling, LLC v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2024
Taylor B. Jolley v. Jason N. Ellis
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2024
Angela M. Greene v. City of Portsmouth
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2024
Massenburg v. City of Petersburg
Supreme Court of Virginia, 2019
Brooks v. City of Roanoke
89 Va. Cir. 439 (Roanoke County Circuit Court, 2015)
S & S Ventures v. City of Petersburg
84 Va. Cir. 228 (Petersburg County Circuit Court, 2012)
Turner v. City of Norfolk
80 Va. Cir. 369 (Norfolk County Circuit Court, 2010)
Gary Community School Corp. v. Roach-Walker
917 N.E.2d 1224 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2009)
Foster v. Western Virginia Water Authority
81 Va. Cir. 481 (Roanoke County Circuit Court, 2007)
Sullivan v. City of Hopewell
70 Va. Cir. 134 (Hopewell County Circuit Court, 2006)
Elsey v. City of Norfolk
62 Va. Cir. 485 (Norfolk County Circuit Court, 2003)
Smith v. Town of Front Royal
61 Va. Cir. 5 (Virginia Circuit Court, 2003)
Gambrell v. City of Norfolk
60 Va. Cir. 328 (Virginia Circuit Court, 2002)
Cooke v. Pouleres
55 Va. Cir. 148 (Norfolk County Circuit Court, 2001)
Carter v. City of Norfolk
54 Va. Cir. 195 (Norfolk County Circuit Court, 2000)
City of Virginia Beach v. Carmichael Development Co.
527 S.E.2d 778 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 S.E.2d 209, 214 Va. 9, 1973 Va. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-city-of-newport-news-va-1973.