Taylor v. City of Columbia

389 F. App'x 325
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2010·No. No. 10-1307·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding • precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Yvonne Murphy Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying the motion, for reconsideration of the court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. City of Columbia, No. 3:07-cv-00983-JFA, 2010 WL 296901 (D.S.C. Jan. 20, 2010) & (Feb. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. City of Columbia, 389 F. App'x 325 (4th Cir. 2010).

389 F. App'x 325 (Taylor v. City of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. City of Columbia
179 L. Ed. 2d 616 (Supreme Court, 2011)