Taylor v. City of Columbia

334 F. App'x 531
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. City of Columbia. Read the opinion of the Court — 389 F. App'x 325
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2009·No. No. 09-1486·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Yvonne Murphy Taylor seeks to appeal magistrate judge’s orders granting in part and denying in part her motions to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. [532]*532§ 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Taylor seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. City of Columbia, 334 F. App'x 531 (4th Cir. 2009).

334 F. App'x 531 (Taylor v. City of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)