Taylor v. Brown

4 Cal. 188
California Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1854·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Oh. J. Murray concurred.

The declaration discloses no cause of action against the defendants.

It seems from its allegations, that the plaintiff was improperly sued in trespass, on account of a levy by a deputy Constable, and having paid the judgment rendered against him, now sues the Constable on his bond for improperly appointing the deputy. All this was wrong. The Constable, like any other ministerial officer, had the right to appoint as many deputies as he pleased. The deputy was not guilty of any trespass in levying by virtue of legal process in his hands. The plaintiff paid the judgment against him, for the trespass, in his own wrong.

The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Brown, 4 Cal. 188 (Cal. 1854).

4 Cal. 188 (Taylor v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Avila
11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 894 (California Court of Appeal, 2004)
Boulas v. Superior Court
188 Cal. App. 3d 422 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
People v. Vermouth
42 Cal. App. 3d 353 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)
People v. Augustine
265 Cal. App. 2d 317 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)
People v. Crovedi
417 P.2d 868 (California Supreme Court, 1966)
People v. Ali
230 Cal. App. 2d 585 (California Court of Appeal, 1964)
Coll v. District Court of San Juan
68 P.R. 114 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1948)
Coll v. Tribunal del Distrito Judicial de San Juan
68 P.R. Dec. 122 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1948)
People v. Manchetti
175 P.2d 533 (California Supreme Court, 1946)
Wines v. Garrison
214 P. 56 (California Supreme Court, 1923)
Mas v. Borinquen Sugar Co.
18 P.R. 299 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1912)
Kaysen v. Steele
44 P. 1042 (Utah Supreme Court, 1896)
Jobson v. Fennell
35 Cal. 711 (California Supreme Court, 1868)