Taylor v. Bridgestone/Firestone

598 S.E.2d 379, 357 N.C. 565, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 1273
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 7, 2003·No. No. 280A03·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Bridgestone/Firestone, 598 S.E.2d 379, 357 N.C. 565, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 1273 (N.C. 2003).

598 S.E.2d 379 (Taylor v. Bridgestone/Firestone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spain v. Spain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Spruill v. N.C. Dept. of Agriculture
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2009
Gordon v. Duke University Med. Ctr.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2008
Mankes v. Unc-General Administration
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2007