Taylor v. Board of Commissioners
This text of 11 N.E. 436 (Taylor v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant claims that, as clerk, he is entitled to compensation from the county for making the opening and closing orders upon the court records.
In order to entitle a clerk to receive money from the county treasury, two things are indispensably necessary: “1. A statute authorizing him to receive compensation for such services, and fixing the amount thereof. 2. A statute authorizing the county commissioners to pay for such services, out of the county treasury.” Noble v. Board, etc., 101 Ind. 127. Wright v. Board, etc., 98 Ind. 88, and cases cited; [463]*463Board, etc., v. Gresham, 101 Ind. 53; Bynum v. Board, etc., 100 Ind. 90; Waymire v. Powell, 105 Ind. 328.
There is no statute authorizing the clerk to demand from the county compensation for such services as those for which judgment is here sought, nor is there any statute authorizing them to be paid out of the county treasury. The statute relied on by the appellant, section 14 of the act of 1879,, does not provide for fees taxable against the county, but for-fees taxable against parties.
The clerk takes his office cum onere and must render some services without specific compensation, and to that class, belong those for which a recovery is here sought.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 N.E. 436, 110 Ind. 462, 1887 Ind. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-board-of-commissioners-ind-1887.