Taylor v. Bettis
This text of 693 F. App'x 190 (Taylor v. Bettis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appellants appeal the district court’s orders granting the Arnold Defendants’ motion to dismiss, granting the E&D Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, granting default judgment against other defendants and awarding damages, and entering final judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no error. As to their argument for sevenfold damages, Appellants merely repeat the argument they raised to the district court, but have failed to identify any error in the district court’s consideration of appropriate damages. As to the remainder of Appellants’ arguments, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Bettis, Nos. 7:09-cv-00183-F; 7:09-cv-00081-F, 2013 WL 5460755, 2014 WL 10677478 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2013; Mar. 27, 2014; Apr. 7, 2016; Sept. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 F. App'x 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-bettis-ca4-2017.