Tay v. Baldwin
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TAY TAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 19-cv-00501-NJR ) JEFF DENNISON, LU WALKER, ) KRISTEN HAMMERSLEY, LARRY ) HICKS, JERID PICKFORD, JOE ) GARRETT, JAMIN SORIA, CHARLES _) CAMPBELL, GREGORY STUCK, and ) ROB JEFFREYS, ) ) Defendants. ) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: Pursuant to MillerCoors LLC v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC, 940 F.3d 922 (7th Cir. 2019), and the Court’s Memorandum and Order entered this day (Doc. 132), the Court ORDERS Defendants, within 21 days of this Order, to develop an individualized case management plan for Plaintiff that takes into consideration Plaintiff's need for safety, her past history of victimization, her medical and psychiatric history, all PREA standards, and the expert witness opinions set forth in this Order and to file that plan with the Court no later than May 22, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 1, 2020 □ NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL Chief U.S. District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tay v. Baldwin (Tay v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.