Taveras v. Ortiz

2021 NY Slip Op 01874
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 2021
DocketIndex No. 26433/17E Appeal No. 13434 Case No. 2020-03231
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 01874 (Taveras v. Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taveras v. Ortiz, 2021 NY Slip Op 01874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Taveras v Ortiz (2021 NY Slip Op 01874)
Taveras v Ortiz
2021 NY Slip Op 01874
Decided on March 25, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 25, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Moulton, Shulman, JJ.

Index No. 26433/17E Appeal No. 13434 Case No. 2020-03231

[*1]Isabel Taveras et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v

Gizette Ortiz, Defendant-Respondent, "John Doe," Defendant.


Mitchell Dranow, Sea Cliff, for appellants.

Mead, Hecht, Conklin & Gallagher, LLP, White Plains (George P. Epstein, II of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John R. Higgitt, J.), entered May 21, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, in this action for personal injuries sustained when defendant's vehicle struck the rear of plaintiff's vehicle, denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The descriptions of the accident given by the parties at their depositions render this matter inappropriate for resolution on summary judgment. In light of plaintiff's testimony that at the time of the accident, she was traveling 40 miles per hour on the expressway, with no cars traveling in front of her, as well as defendant's sworn testimony that plaintiff suddenly stopped on the highway, the record is sufficient to offer a possible nonnegligent explanation for the accident (see Baez-Pena v MM Truck & Body Repair, Inc., 151 AD3d 473 [1st Dept 2017]; Berger v New York City Hous. Auth., 82 AD3d 531 [1st Dept 2011]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 25, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taveras v. Ortiz
2021 NY Slip Op 01874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 01874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taveras-v-ortiz-nyappdiv-2021.