Tatum v. State

44 S.W.2d 378
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 18, 1931·No. No. 14817·Published

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

Burglary is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts.

The bills of exception simply carry forward the contention of the appellant that the indictment is insufficient. This was urged in a motion to quash the indictment based upon the proposition that the ownership was not sufficiently alleged. In the indictment it is charged that the accused entered the house occupied by O. L. Curren, hereinafter called “injured party.” The contention has been held unsound in the authorities cited by Mr. Branch in his Ann. Tex. P. C. § 2324, among which are the following: Tidwell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 45 S. W. 1015; Moore v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 400, 88 S. W. 230.

■ The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tatum v. State, 44 S.W.2d 378 (Tex. 1931).

44 S.W.2d 378 (Tatum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barfield v. State
45 S.W. 1015 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1898)
Moore v. State
88 S.W. 230 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)