Tatum v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Tatum v. State

43 S.W.2d 1119

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 13, 1931

DocketNo. 14816

StatusPublished

This text of 43 S.W.2d 1119 (Tatum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tatum v. State, 43 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

The conviction is for theft of chickens; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The facts heard upon the trial are not before this court.

There is only one bill of exception complaining that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that the court should have so instructed the jury. Manifestly this court cannot determine that question without knowledge of the facts that were before the trial court. Tex. Jur. vol. 4, §§ 167-169.

Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

The conviction is for theft of chickens; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The facts heard upon the trial are not before this court.

There is only one bill of exception complaining that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that the court should have so instructed the jury. Manifestly this court cannot determine that question without knowledge of the facts that were before the trial court. Tex. Jur. vol. 4, §§ 167-169.

Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 S.W.2d 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatum-v-state-texcrimapp-1931.