Tatishev v. City of New York

84 A.D.3d 656, 923 N.Y.S.2d 523
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 26, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 84 A.D.3d 656 (Tatishev v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tatishev v. City of New York, 84 A.D.3d 656, 923 N.Y.S.2d 523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered August 28, 2009, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

After this appeal was argued, the Court of Appeals clarified that “the reckless disregard standard of care in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (e) only applies when a driver of an authorized emergency vehicle involved in an emergency operation engages in the specific conduct exempted from the rules of the [657]*657road by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (b)” (Kabir v County of Monroe, 16 NY3d 217, 220 [2011]). “Any other injury-causing conduct of such a driver is governed by the principles of ordinary negligence” (id.). Here, the injury-causing conduct of the police driver — making a left turn at a green light, within the speed limit, and not contrary to any restriction on movement or turning — does not fall within any of the categories of privileged conduct set forth in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (b). Accordingly, plaintiffs’ claim is governed by principles of ordinary negligence, whether or not the police driver was responding to an emergency. Because the record presents a triable issue as to whether the police driver was negligent when his vehicle struck the pedestrian plaintiff in the crosswalk, we affirm the denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mulero v. Rollins
2025 NY Slip Op 32018(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Holliday v. City of New Rochelle
2021 NY Slip Op 04123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Asante v. Asante
135 A.D.3d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Fajardo v. City of New York
95 A.D.3d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Gonzalez v. City of New York
91 A.D.3d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Katanov v. County of Nassau
91 A.D.3d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
LOGRASSO, MICHAEL J. v. CITY OF TONAWANDA
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
LoGrasso v. City of Tonawanda
87 A.D.3d 1390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 A.D.3d 656, 923 N.Y.S.2d 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatishev-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2011.