Tatham Mortgage Co. v. Reiss

135 So. 2d 258
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 1961
DocketNos. 60-454, 60-455
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 So. 2d 258 (Tatham Mortgage Co. v. Reiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tatham Mortgage Co. v. Reiss, 135 So. 2d 258 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinions

LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

The chancellor entered a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage in favor of the plaintiff, Edith P. Reiss, against the defendant, Tatham Mortgage Co. and others. Both the plaintiff and defendant filed appeals. Defendant, Tatham Mortgage Co., contended that nothing was due on the mortgage so that the foreclosure suit should have been dismissed while plaintiff, Edith P. Reiss, contended that the chancellor should have entered a decree for the full amount of the mortgage instead of only for the amount past due.

We have considered the merits of the contentions of both parties and we find that there is enough evidence to sustain the findings of the chancellor and that no abuse of discretion has been made to appear so the decree should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

HORTON, C. J., concurs. CARROLL, CHAS., J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Granger Lumber Company, Inc.
275 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 2d 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatham-mortgage-co-v-reiss-fladistctapp-1961.