Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Tate v. State

Tate v. State

121 So. 3d 1156, 2013 WL 5222076, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14823
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tate v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7563 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 2013·No. No. 4D13-1965·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s April 10, 2013 Motion for Discharge. The motion was an untimely request for postconviction relief and no valid exception to the time limitation is alleged in the motion. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

STEVENSON, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tate v. State, 121 So. 3d 1156, 2013 WL 5222076, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

121 So. 3d 1156 (Tate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.