Tate v. State

121 So. 3d 1156, 2013 WL 5222076, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14823
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 18, 2013
DocketNo. 4D13-1965
StatusPublished

This text of 121 So. 3d 1156 (Tate v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tate v. State, 121 So. 3d 1156, 2013 WL 5222076, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s April 10, 2013 Motion for Discharge. The motion was an untimely request for postconviction relief and no valid exception to the time limitation is alleged in the motion. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

STEVENSON, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 So. 3d 1156, 2013 WL 5222076, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.