Home/Supreme Court/Tate v. National Acceptance Co. of America

Tate v. National Acceptance Co. of America

379 U.S. 836, 85 S. Ct. 71, 13 L. Ed. 2d 43, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 565
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1964
DocketNo. 264
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 379 U.S. 836 (Tate v. National Acceptance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tate v. National Acceptance Co. of America, 379 U.S. 836, 85 S. Ct. 71, 13 L. Ed. 2d 43, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 565 (1964).

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barron's Educational Series, Inc. v. Hiltzik
987 F. Supp. 224 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Hyde v. United States
950 F. Supp. 418 (D. New Hampshire, 1996)
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Teleconcepts, Inc.
71 F.3d 1086 (Third Circuit, 1995)
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, Incorporated
71 F.3d 1086 (Third Circuit, 1995)
Production Steel, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp. of America (In Re Production Steel, Inc.)
54 B.R. 417 (M.D. Tennessee, 1985)
Schweitzer, Josephine v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the Reading Company. Seibert, Mildred, Individually and as of the Estate of Seibert, Paul D., Deceased v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) the Reading Company. Wentzel, George A. v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the Reading Company. Elaine Schwambach, of the Estate of Woodrow W. Schwambach and Merlin Schwambach, of That Estate v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the Reading Company. Frank, Marilyn L., as of the Estate of Russell C. Wennell, Deceased v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the Reading Company. Scholl, Martin H., Individually and as of the Estate of Ethel M. Scholl, Deceased v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the Reading Company. Fenstermacher, Earl R., and Scholing, Carl v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Corporation, and the Reading Company, a Corporation v. Anchor Packing Company, Celotex Corporation, Successor-In-Interest to Philip Carey Manufacturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company And/or Panacon Corporation, Certainteed Corporation, Durox Equipment Company, Garlock, Inc., Janos Industrial Insulation Corporation, John Crane- Houdaille, Inc., J.W. Roberts Ltd., Keene Corporation, Nicolet, Inc., Nosroc Corporation, Successor-In-Interest to G. & W.H. Corson, Inc. And Calcite Quarry Corporation, Studebaker-Worthington, Inc., Tannetics, Inc., Turner & Newall Plc, Turner Asbestos Fibers Ltd., Union Rubber, Inc. And Vellumoid Company, Third-Party Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. And Flintkote Company. Appeal of Fenstermacher, Earl R., in No. 84-1203. Appeal of Scholing, Carl, in No. 84-1204. Josephine Schweitzer, Mildred Seibert, Individually and as of the Estate of Paul D. Seibert, Deceased, George A. Wentzel, Elaine Schwambach, of the Estate of Woodrow W. Schwambach, and Merlin Schwambach, of That Estate, Marilyn L. Frank, as of the Estate of Russell C. Wennell, Deceased, Martin H. Scholl, Individually and as of the Estate of Ethel M. Scholl, Deceased v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the Reading Company. Appeal of Consolidated Rail Corporation. (Two Cases) Earl R. Fenstermacher and Carl Scholing v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Corporation, and the Reading Company, a Corporation v. Anchor Packing Company, Celotex Corporation, Successor-In-Interest to Philip Carey Manufacturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company And/or Panacon Corporation, Certainteed Corporation, Durox Equipment Company, Garlock, Inc., Janos Industrial Insulation Corporation, John Crane- Houdaille, Inc., J.W. Roberts Ltd., Keene Corporation, Nicolet, Inc., Nosroc Corporation, Successor-In-Interest to G. & W.H. Corson, Inc. And Calcite Quarry Corporation, Studebaker-Worthington, Inc., Tannetics, Inc., Turner & Newall Plc, Turner Asbestos Fibers Ltd., Union Rubber, Inc. And Vellumoid Company, Third-Party Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. And Flintkote Company. In the Matter of the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Debtor, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor, Andrew Thomas and Trudell Thomas, His Wife, Appeal of Andrew Thomas and Trudell Thomas, in No. 84-5293. Appeal of Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor in No. 84-5310. In the Matter of the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Debtor, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor . Appeal of Joseph Pongrac, Sr., Robert A. Bingle, Alexander Redelico and Evelyn Redelico, H/w, Joseph C. Popadick and Elma Popadick, H/w, Edward Witos and Philomena Witos, H/w, Mark Gammel, Harry Guralchuk, Steve Palichak, Joseph M. Pinto, Frank Pongrac, Jr., John Sowizral, Harry Wilson, George J. Zeblisky, Robert J.F. Brobyn, Richard Middleton and Any and All Persons Acting on Their Behalf
758 F.2d 936 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Schweitzer v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
758 F.2d 936 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
601 F. Supp. 496 (N.D. Georgia, 1985)
9 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1377, Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,412 in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of City of Cambridge
719 F.2d 493 (First Circuit, 1983)
In re Boston & Maine Corp.
719 F.2d 493 (First Circuit, 1983)
Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, P.C. v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc.
521 F. Supp. 1046 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Carr (In re Carr)
8 B.R. 723 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1980)
McHone v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
406 F. Supp. 484 (S.D. Ohio, 1975)
Kusner v. First Pennsylvania Corporation
395 F. Supp. 276 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
Landon v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation
384 F. Supp. 450 (S.D. New York, 1974)
Maytag v. United States
493 F.2d 995 (First Circuit, 1974)
Maytag v. United States
493 F.2d 995 (Tenth Circuit, 1974)
In Re Carpenter
363 F. Supp. 218 (W.D. Tennessee, 1973)
Spatt v. State of New York
361 F. Supp. 1048 (E.D. New York, 1973)
Doyle v. United States
358 F. Supp. 300 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 U.S. 836, 85 S. Ct. 71, 13 L. Ed. 2d 43, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-national-acceptance-co-of-america-scotus-1964.