Tate v. Culver & Cain Production

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided August 26, 2025·No. 4:25-cv-00913·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION REBECCA LEE TATE, ) Plaintiff, v. No. 4:25-CV-00913 RHH CULVER & CAIN PRODUCTION, et al. Defendants. OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [ECF No. 13]. When the Court dismissed this action, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, see ECF Nos. 6 and 7; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and it is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). As a result, the Court will deny the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 13] is DENIED. Dated this 26" day of August, 2025.

HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tate v. Culver & Cain Production, (E.D. Mo. 2025).

Tate v. Culver & Cain Production (Tate v. Culver & Cain Production) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)