Tassone v. D'Varga
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Matthew Tassone,
Petitioner, Case No. 2:24-cv-2123 Judge James L. Graham v. Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura
Judge James E. Green,
Respondent.
Order
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, which recommended that Petitioner’s habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available state-court remedies. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Upon review, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9), which is hereby adopted. Petitioner’s habeas corpus petition (doc. 2) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Further, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the case caption be updated to reflect that Franklin County Municipal Court Judge James E. Green (and not Judge Jessica G. D’Varga) is the correct respondent in this action. The Court adopts that recommendation as well. The Court further finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue because, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right that is remediable at this juncture in this proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Finally, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court declines denies Petitioner leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997).
DATE: October 24, 2024 s/ James L. Graham JAMES L. GRAHAM United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tassone v. D'Varga (Tassone v. D'Varga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.