Tasse v. Interamerican Transport Co.

516 So. 2d 287, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2665, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11226, 1987 WL 1898
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 24, 1987
DocketNo. BQ-333
StatusPublished

This text of 516 So. 2d 287 (Tasse v. Interamerican Transport Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tasse v. Interamerican Transport Co., 516 So. 2d 287, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2665, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11226, 1987 WL 1898 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

NIMMONS, Judge.

The deputy commissioner’s appealed order denying compensation benefits was prematurely entered and must be reversed for further proceedings.

After the presentation of testimony and evidence on June 3,1986, the attorneys for the respective parties and the deputy agreed to the need for further hearing on a subsequent date to be scheduled later on. The testimony of two doctors and the claimant were to be taken when the hearing reconvened. Instead, the deputy, without further notice or proceedings, entered on October 27, 1986, the appealed order adjudicating the merits adverse to the claimant.

We reject appellees’ argument that claimant waived his right to raise the above issue because of his failure to attempt to have the deputy’s erroneous action rectified within the 30-day period before the order became final under Section 440.-25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). Compare e.g. Florida Refrigerated Service v. Meeks, 470 So.2d 820 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Acosta Roofing Company v. Gillyard, 402 So.2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

In view of the need for reversal on the above ground, we do not address appellant's other ground in which he challenges the deputy’s finding that appellant reached maximum medical improvement on June 19, 1984.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Refrigerated Service v. Meeks
470 So. 2d 820 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Acosta Roofing Co. v. Gillyard
402 So. 2d 1321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 287, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2665, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11226, 1987 WL 1898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tasse-v-interamerican-transport-co-fladistctapp-1987.