Acosta Roofing Co. v. Gillyard

402 So. 2d 1321
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 1981
DocketZZ-200
StatusPublished
Cited by43 cases

This text of 402 So. 2d 1321 (Acosta Roofing Co. v. Gillyard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acosta Roofing Co. v. Gillyard, 402 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

402 So.2d 1321 (1981)

ACOSTA ROOFING COMPANY and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Appellants,
v.
Gussie GILLYARD, Appellee.

No. ZZ-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 24, 1981.
Rehearing Denied September 18, 1981.

*1322 Summers Warden, Miami, for appellants.

Jay M. Levy of Silver, Levy & Hershoff, and R. Cory Schnepper of Ser, DeCardenas, Levine, Busch & Allen, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.

The only colorable issue raised by the employer/carrier's appeal in this workers' compensation case is whether we should reverse the deputy's award of temporary total disability benefits during the period between the date of the industrial accident, October 2, 1979, and April 15, 1980, the declared date of maximum medical improvement. The deputy is said to have erred in fixing the latter date by inadvertently inserting in his order the date of the treating physician's written medical report, rather than the date of the last medical examination to which the report related, namely, February 29, 1980. This error might readily have been corrected by application to the deputy during the 20 day period before it became final. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1979). Claimant concedes the error now and we will not suppose he would have resisted its correction at that earlier, more appropriate time. We therefore treat the error as inconsequential in order to discourage substantially groundless and unnecessary appeals to this court which serve to delay payment of benefits and unjustifiably tax the limited resources of the judicial system.

AFFIRMED. Appellee's motion for attorney's fee is GRANTED in the amount of $1,500.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bogdanova v. Royal Hanneford Circus
848 So. 2d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure
795 So. 2d 863 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Commercial Carrier Corp. v. LaPointe
723 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez
742 So. 2d 301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Owens-Illinois v. DeLoach
686 So. 2d 1387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Amendments to Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure
603 So. 2d 425 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Aircraft Services v. Reyes
582 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Albertson's Inc. v. Natale
555 So. 2d 946 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Montgomery Ward v. Wade
545 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
The Florida Bar
535 So. 2d 243 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Tasse v. Interamerican Transport Co.
516 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris
503 So. 2d 925 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Bill's Equipment and Rentals v. Teel
498 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Newham v. Union Correctional Institute
485 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Kist v. Porter
471 So. 2d 678 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Florida Bar re Workers' Compensation Rules of Procedure
460 So. 2d 898 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
EDGEWOOD BOYS'RANCH FOUNDATION v. Robinson
451 So. 2d 532 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Allman v. Meredith Corp.
451 So. 2d 957 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
DEPT. OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SEC. v. Am. Bldg. Main.
449 So. 2d 932 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 So. 2d 1321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-roofing-co-v-gillyard-fladistctapp-1981.