Tash v. Adams
This text of 140 F. App'x 744 (Tash v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner David Laron Tash appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to stay proceedings in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 case pending exhaustion of other claims in state court.
The order Tash seeks to appeal is not final and appealable. See, e.g., National Distrib. Agency v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 117 F.3d 432, 433 (9th Cir.1997). Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; cf. Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections of Ill., 434 U.S. 257, 265, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 F. App'x 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tash-v-adams-ca9-2005.