Tasby v. United States Parole Commission

88 F. App'x 616
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2004
DocketNo. 03-7655
StatusPublished

This text of 88 F. App'x 616 (Tasby v. United States Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tasby v. United States Parole Commission, 88 F. App'x 616 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie Tasby, a Texas state prisoner, seeks to appeal the order of the district court denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition without prejudice. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tasby has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 F. App'x 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tasby-v-united-states-parole-commission-ca4-2004.