Tarulli v. Ameriprise Financial Services
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Sone □□□ DR DATE FILED:_ 8/12/2021 BART J. TARULLI, : Plaintiff, : : 19-cy-2039 (LJL) -y- : : ORDER AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, : Defendant. :
LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Bart Tarulli has applied for leave to appeal in forma pauperis this Court’s Order, at Dkt. No. 32, adopting the Report and Recommendation at Dkt. No. 22 and dismissing the complaint. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that Plaintiff's appeal from the Court’s Order at Dkt. No. 32 is not taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Plaintiff's application is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner.
SO ORDERED. iF Dated: August 12, 2021 el ME New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tarulli v. Ameriprise Financial Services (Tarulli v. Ameriprise Financial Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.