Tartar v. Hall

California Supreme Court

Tartar v. Hall

3 Cal. 263

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1853

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 3 Cal. 263 (Tartar v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tartar v. Hall, 3 Cal. 263 (Cal. 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

The mortgage executed by the defendant, operates an estoppel to the defence he has set up; according to well-established principles of public policy, for the security of good faith and fair dealing, a party is not allowed to controvert the declarations which he has made by deed, or to deny the enforcement of rights which he has thus attempted to confer.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

The mortgage executed by the defendant, operates an estoppel to the defence he has set up; according to well-established principles of public policy, for the security of good faith and fair dealing, a party is not allowed to controvert the declarations which he has made by deed, or to deny the enforcement of rights which he has thus attempted to confer.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cal. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tartar-v-hall-cal-1853.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack