Tartar v. Hall
3 Cal. 263
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.
The mortgage executed by the defendant, operates an estoppel to the defence he has set up; according to well-established principles of public policy, for the security of good faith and fair dealing, a party is not allowed to controvert the declarations which he has made by deed, or to deny the enforcement of rights which he has thus attempted to confer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tartar v. Hall, 3 Cal. 263 (Cal. 1853).
3 Cal. 263 (Tartar v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Acton
178 Okla. 400 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Standard Savings Loan Association v. Acton
1936 OK 827 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Elizalde v. Murphy
126 P. 875 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
Freiermuth v. Steigleman
62 P. 615 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Stewart v. Powers
33 P. 486 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Stidham v. Matthews
29 Ark. 650 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1874)
Kirkaldie v. Larrabee
31 Cal. 455 (California Supreme Court, 1866)
Clark v. Baker
14 Cal. 612 (California Supreme Court, 1860)
Redman v. Bellamy
4 Cal. 247 (California Supreme Court, 1854)