Redman v. Bellamy

California Supreme Court

Redman v. Bellamy

4 Cal. 247

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Cal. 247 (Redman v. Bellamy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redman v. Bellamy, 4 Cal. 247 (Cal. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

*Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt

[250] delivered the opinion, of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

The plaintiff claims under a Sheriff’s sale. The execution, was upon a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage, executed, and given by the defendant. He is therefore estopped from setting up the defenses attempted in this case. So we decided in the case of Tartar v. Hall, 3 Cal. 263.

Judgment affirmed.

Motion for a rehearing and review denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt

[250] delivered the opinion, of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

The plaintiff claims under a Sheriff’s sale. The execution, was upon a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage, executed, and given by the defendant. He is therefore estopped from setting up the defenses attempted in this case. So we decided in the case of Tartar v. Hall, 3 Cal. 263.

Judgment affirmed.

Motion for a rehearing and review denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cal. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redman-v-bellamy-cal-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack