Redman v. Bellamy

4 Cal. 247
California Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1854·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt

[250] delivered the opinion, of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

The plaintiff claims under a Sheriff’s sale. The execution, was upon a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage, executed, and given by the defendant. He is therefore estopped from setting up the defenses attempted in this case. So we decided in the case of Tartar v. Hall, 3 Cal. 263.

Judgment affirmed.

Motion for a rehearing and review denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redman v. Bellamy, 4 Cal. 247 (Cal. 1854).

4 Cal. 247 (Redman v. Bellamy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monaghan v. Maxwell
240 P. 1029 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1925)