Tarkenton v. State

135 S.W.2d 716, 138 Tex. Crim. 292, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 648
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 29, 1939·No. No. 20,595.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Conviction is for attempting to pass a forged instrument, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The original transcript failed to show any notice of appeal as required by Art. 827 C. C. P. By a supplemental transcript now before us there is shown a "docket entry" by the trial judge stating that notice of appeal was given, but it does not appear that such order was carried into the court's minutes. It has been held many times that the docket entry is not a "record" entry as required by Art. 827. See 4 Tex. Jur., Sec. 123, p. 172, and cases there cited; also Lenox v. State,55 Tex. Crim. 259, 116 S.W. 816; Haynie v. State, 92 Tex. Crim. 45,241 S.W. 478; Bryson v. State, 20 S.W.2d 1047; Thackerson v. State, 26 S.W.2d 241.

The appeal is dismissed.

ON APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE THE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tarkenton v. State, 135 S.W.2d 716, 138 Tex. Crim. 292, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 648 (Tex. 1939).

135 S.W.2d 716 (Tarkenton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffith v. State
354 S.W.2d 942 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Lieb v. State
288 S.W.2d 110 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Ash v. State
202 S.W.2d 849 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1947)
Tyson v. State
154 S.W.2d 477 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)