Tarkenton v. State
This text of 135 S.W.2d 716 (Tarkenton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Conviction is for attempting to pass a forged instrument, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.
The original transcript failed to show any notice of appeal as required by Art. 827 C. C. P. By a supplemental transcript now before us there is shown a "docket entry" by the trial judge stating that notice of appeal was given, but it does not appear that such order was carried into the court's minutes. It has been held many times that the docket entry is not a "record" entry as required by Art. 827. See 4 Tex. Jur., Sec. 123, p. 172, and cases there cited; also Lenox v. State,
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 S.W.2d 716, 138 Tex. Crim. 292, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarkenton-v-state-texcrimapp-1939.