Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Lenox v. State

Lenox v. State

116 S.W. 816, 55 Tex. Crim. 259, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 42
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 10, 1909·No. No. 4404.·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The record is before us without notice of appeal. For this reason the appeal will be dismissed. We desire to notice, in passing, that the statement of facts contained in the record does not show that it was approved by the trial judge. Should the record be perfected by showing the notice of appeal, we call attention to the failure o£ the court to approve the statement of facts. In the absence of the approval of the judge the statment of facts would not be considered.

Because notice of appeal is not shown in the record, the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lenox v. State, 116 S.W. 816, 55 Tex. Crim. 259, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 42 (Tex. 1909).

116 S.W. 816 (Lenox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarkenton v. State
135 S.W.2d 716 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Houston v. State
117 S.W.2d 109 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Scott v. State
119 S.W.2d 884 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Thompson v. State
116 S.W.2d 407 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Taylor v. State
116 S.W.2d 391 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Deaton v. State
116 S.W.2d 747 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Opperman v. State
116 S.W.2d 749 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
McGinty v. State
116 S.W.2d 713 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Aubrey v. State
26 S.W.2d 213 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Demus v. State
16 S.W.2d 251 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Haynie v. State
241 S.W. 478 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Sauzeda v. State
216 S.W. 1098 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)