Target Corporation v. John Ko

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 11, 2014·No. 05-14-00502-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 11, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00502-CV

TARGET CORPORATION, Appellant V.

JOHN KO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-04853

ORDER

Appellant filed its notice of appeal on April 24, 2014 of an interlocutory order. The

clerk’s record was filed on May 14, 2014. On May 19, 2014, the trial court signed an amended order denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment and granting permission to appeal the interlocutory amended order. Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal and petition for appeal on June 2, 2014. On June 4, 2014, the clerk’s office of this Court inadvertently sent appellant notice that its brief was past due. In response, appellant tendered its brief and filed a motion for an extension of time to file its brief on June 10, 2014.

Appellant’s brief is not yet due because this Court has not yet ruled on its petition for appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. Nevertheless, we GRANT appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellant on June 10, 2014 filed as of the date of this order.

Any response to appellant’s petition for review is due by June 12, 2014. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 28.3(f). Appellee’s brief on the merits will be due twenty days after any order of this Court granting appellant’s petition for review.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Target Corporation v. John Ko, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Target Corporation v. John Ko (Target Corporation v. John Ko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.